IRIA News

5 minute read

Iran has submitted a 14-point proposal to the U.S. aimed at ending the ongoing conflict, according to Iranian state-linked media reports. Iranian media also reported that Iran has received a response from the U.S. to its proposal.

The plan comes amid a fragile ceasefire that took effect on April 8, but tensions remain high and key issues unresolved. The proposal calls for a full resolution of the conflict within 30 days, rejecting an earlier U.S. framework that suggested a two-month ceasefire period.

Iranian officials have emphasized that the focus should be on ending the war entirely, rather than extending temporary pauses in fighting.

While the U.S. has not officially confirmed receiving the plan or responding to it, President Donald Trump said he is reviewing the proposal and expressed skepticism about its acceptability. “They want to make a deal, I’m not satisfied with it, so we’ll see what happens,” Trump said.

“I will soon be reviewing the plan that Iran has just sent to us, but can’t imagine that it would be acceptable in that they have not yet paid a big enough price for what they have done to Humanity and the World, over the last 47 years,” Trump posted on his social media account.

"I will soon be reviewing the plan that Iran has just sent to us, but can’t imagine that it would be acceptable in that they have not yet paid a big enough price for what they have done to Humanity, and the World, over the last 47 years…" – President Donald J. Trump pic.twitter.com/XFcIRvmR9U

— The White House (@WhiteHouse) May 2, 2026

Key Demands by Iran

According to Iranian media outlets, the proposal includes several major demands directed at Washington. These include guarantees against future military action, the withdrawal of U.S. forces from areas surrounding Iran, and the lifting of economic sanctions.

Tehran is also calling for the release of frozen Iranian financial assets, payment of reparations, and an end to what it describes as a naval blockade of its ports. In addition, the proposal reportedly includes demands related to regional dynamics, including a halt to Israeli military operations in Lebanon.

Another key component involves the Strait of Hormuz, a critical global oil route. Iran has proposed a new mechanism to govern the waterway, where shipping has been heavily restricted since the conflict began, contributing to rising global energy prices.

Proposal Delivered Through Pakistan

Iranian officials have stated that the proposal was delivered through Pakistan, which has been acting as an intermediary between Iran and the U.S.

Trump, speaking to reporters, said he had been briefed on the general concept of the proposal but had not yet reviewed its full details. “They told me about the concept of the deal,” he said. “They’re going to give me the exact wording now.”

In separate remarks, Trump suggested that further military action remains an option if negotiations fail. “If they misbehave. If they do something bad,” he said. “But right now we’ll see.”

He also signaled that the U.S. is not planning a full withdrawal from the conflict, stating: “We’re not leaving.”

Conflicting Frameworks Highlight

The Iranian proposal appears to be a response to earlier U.S. plans, which reportedly included multiple conditions such as reopening the Strait of Hormuz and ending Iran’s nuclear program.

Iranian officials have said their current proposal does not address nuclear issues directly, instead focusing on ending hostilities and resolving immediate conflict-related concerns.

This divergence highlights the significant gap between the two sides, particularly on long-term strategic issues such as nuclear capabilities and regional military presence.

Trump has repeatedly stated that “Iran can never have a nuclear weapon,” while Tehran continues to insist that its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes.

Legal and Political Pressure in Washington

The timing of the proposal also coincides with increasing domestic pressure in the U.S. over the continuation of the war. Under U.S. law, the president is required to obtain congressional approval within 60 days of notifying lawmakers of military action or cease hostilities.

Friday marked the 60th day since Trump formally notified Congress of the strikes carried out in early March. The administration has argued that the ceasefire has effectively paused the legal timeline, a claim that has drawn criticism from lawmakers.

Several members of Congress, including Republicans, have expressed concern over the direction and cost of the conflict. “I don’t really want to do that,” Senator Josh Hawley said, referring to continuing the war. “I want to wind it down.”

Senator Lisa Murkowski also raised doubts about both the military strategy and the prospects for successful negotiations. “While the administration may point to ongoing negotiations, events on the ground and the rhetoric coming out of Tehran tell a different story,” she said.

“But if the U.S. steps back abruptly and prematurely, we almost certainly leave their critical capabilities intact.”

Regional and Global Impact

Beyond the immediate diplomatic efforts, the conflict continues to have broader regional and global consequences. Iran’s restrictions on shipping through the Strait of Hormuz have disrupted global oil supplies, contributing to rising fuel prices.

In the U.S., average gas prices have climbed significantly, reflecting the wider economic impact. At the same time, OPEC has announced plans to increase production, though uncertainty in the market remains high.

Meanwhile, tensions are also escalating in neighboring regions. The Israeli military has issued new evacuation warnings in southern Lebanon, signaling the risk of further escalation beyond the core U.S.-Iran confrontation.

Despite renewed diplomatic efforts, the path to a comprehensive agreement remains unclear. Both sides appear to be maintaining firm positions, with significant differences over timelines, conditions, and long-term commitments.

Iran’s push for a rapid resolution within 30 days contrasts sharply with the more gradual approach previously outlined by the U.S. At the same time, continued military posturing and political pressure on both sides complicate the negotiation process.